CASE STUDY · RAIL VEHICLES

The train stays at the factory.
With ONIS 20kV.

For a rail manufacturer, we measured train input impedance directly at the production site. With ONIS 20kV, our independently developed medium-voltage solution, measurement became part of the on-site validation process.

ONIS 20kV: developed by morEnergy, deployed at the customer’s site

The challenge and our solution
DEVELOPED BY MORENERGYONIS 20kV
ONIS 20kV: the morEnergy measurement container on a trailer next to a railway vehicle at the factory
Mobile medium-voltage solution in a 10-foot container · Product rendering
IN THIS DEPLOYMENT

The measurement equipment comes to the train.

The operational benefit
1 working day

Delivery

Bring ONIS 20kV to the production site.

1 working day

Train measurement

Measure the train where it is built.

The container travels. The train stays at the factory.Less transport, personnel and coordination effort reduces the associated costs.

Durations from this deployment: delivery on the project’s route and measurement of one train. Preparation, test-environment measurements and evaluation are not fully included. Duration depends on location and test scope.

01 / THE CHALLENGE

The measurements were needed.
Getting there took effort.

Determine frequency-dependent train input impedance. In different operating states. Directly at the production site.

THE STARTING POINT

One train. Many journeys.

Previously, measurements required an external test facility. Scheduling, transporting the train and returning it involved several weeks of lead time.

FactoryTest facility

The factory lacked the specialist equipment and experience for on-site measurement.

OUR SOLUTION

The measurement equipment comes to the train.

With ONIS 20kV, we scaled our ONIS technology to medium voltage and integrated it into a mobile 10-foot container.

ONIS 20kVMeasurement at the factory
Developed by morEnergy. Deployed at the customer’s site.
THE ENGINEERING QUESTION

Why this measurement matters.

The train and its supply interact electrically. Resonances can amplify voltage and current components; the operating configuration can also change the input characteristics. Our on-site measurements provide a dataset for assessing relevant frequency regions and interpreting differences between configurations.

The examples use synthetic models, not customer measurement data. They do not show a finding on the customer’s train and are not proof of stability.

Understanding resonancesInteractive RLC equivalent model · Not a train measurement
01 / EXCITATION

The current stays the same.

In the simplified parallel RLC equivalent circuit, the current excitation is held constant.

02 / DAMPING

The resonance changes.

The weaker the damping, the higher the impedance at resonance.

03 / VOLTAGE

The response becomes larger.

For the same current excitation, the higher impedance produces a larger voltage response.

SCENARIO 01 / RESONANCE

What happens when damping is low?

Illustrative model

Reduce the damping. The excitation stays the same while the resonance peak grows.

Current damping More strongly damped reference
01 / FREQUENCY DOMAIN

How strongly does the circuit respond to continuous sinusoidal excitation?

For the same current excitation, the voltage response at resonance is 5.0 times that of the more strongly damped reference.

Illustrative equivalent model. Not a train measurement or acceptance limits. Axes normalized.

The model behind the plots

Illustrative equivalent model, not a train measurement. The axes are normalized. The frequency response shows sinusoidal current excitation. The time waveform shows steady state: a prescribed fundamental with a continuous superimposed voltage component at resonance. Both views use the same RLC circuit and damping value; neither represents actual train values or acceptance limits.

|Z_RLC| / Z₀ = 1 / √[d² + (x − 1/x)²]; x = f/f₀; Z₀ = √(L/C); d = Z₀/R

For the ideal parallel RLC circuit, f₀ = 1 / (2π√(LC)). For the same current excitation, normalized voltage response is proportional to |Z_RLC| / Z₀. The reference uses d = 0.8. This model does not describe a specific train or supply topology.

The time waveform is the sum of the fundamental and a higher-frequency voltage component:

u(t) = Û₁ sin(2πf₁t) + Ûh(d) sin(2πfht)

Û₁ is the fundamental voltage amplitude. The amplitude Ûh of the superimposed voltage component follows from the fixed current excitation and the equivalent-circuit impedance:

Ûh(d) = |Z_RLC(fh;d)| · Îh

Îh stays constant as the slider moves. In this example its frequency is at resonance: fh = f₀ = 12f₁. The equivalent-circuit impedance is real there, so this voltage component is shown without an additional phase shift. Less damping increases the impedance at this frequency and therefore increases Ûh. The fundamental, frequency ratio and current amplitude are illustrative choices. The plotted total voltage is normalized by Û₁.

What this means for engineering evaluation

Our deployment focused on characterizing the frequency response at the train input and assessing resonances. The train and its supply form an electrical system: converters, filters and controls interact with the network. Unfavorable interactions can amplify voltage and current components and place additional stress on equipment.

A simplified parallel RLC equivalent circuit illustrates the principle. Its impedance rises near resonance. For the same current excitation, weaker damping produces a larger voltage response:

Here, ZRLC is the impedance of the simplified RLC equivalent circuit. ΔU and ΔI are the complex voltage and current components at the frequency being considered.

ΔU(f) = ZRLC(f) · ΔI(f)

Back to the project: With ONIS 20kV, we made the train’s input characteristics measurable on site. This gave the validation engineers a dataset for assessing relevant frequency regions. The weak damping in the plot is an explanatory example, not a finding on the customer’s train.

Why compare operating states?Synthetic comparison of operating states · Not a customer finding
IN THE CUSTOMER PROJECT

2 operating configurations

Measured separately. Differences interpreted in context. Phase and the real part of admittance were considered alongside magnitude.

ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

An abnormal response calls for investigation.

A negative real part alone does not prove system instability. Interaction with the supply and measurement conditions belong in the assessment.

SCENARIO 02 / OPERATING STATE

A feature revealed by comparing operating states.

Synthetic example

Enable the illustrative state with an abnormal response. In the highlighted frequency band, the real part becomes negative and phase exceeds +90°.

Illustrative state A Illustrative abnormal state B
REAL PART OF ADMITTANCE
PHASE OF ADMITTANCE
In the orange frequency band, the real part becomes negative and phase exceeds +90°. This example requires further assessment; it is not a finding on the customer’s train.

Synthetic example, not a customer finding. Neither a standards test nor proof of stability.

Notes on the synthetic example

Hypothetical fault scenario, not a customer finding. Both curves come from an independent synthetic model. Frequency is dimensionless and admittance uses a common reference. This illustration is neither a standards test nor proof of stability.

A negative real part in a frequency band can indicate behavior that counteracts positive damping. This calls for a closer investigation of interaction with the supply. In the scalar model, it corresponds to a phase angle outside ±90°.

Re{Yin} = |Yin| cos(φY)
An abnormal response calls for investigation.

A negative real part alone does not prove system instability. Likewise, an unremarkable frequency region does not guarantee stability for every operating and supply condition. Applicable criteria, measurement conditions and possible effects of existing harmonics belong in the engineering assessment.

In our deployment, this meant measuring the configurations separately and interpreting their differences. The abnormal behavior in the example illustrates why this approach is useful; it does not describe a fault encountered in the project.

The measurement task in detail
MEASURED QUANTITY

Input admittance

The measured quantity was input admittance — the reciprocal of input impedance.

PROJECT DEPLOYMENT

Two configurations

The train’s input characteristics were measured in two operating configurations.

APPROACH

Evaluate together

The manufacturer’s validation engineers and morEnergy interpret the results in their engineering context.

To validate new train series, our customer needed to determine frequency-dependent input impedance in different operating states. Previously, this required measurements at an external test facility. Scheduling, transporting the train and returning it involved several weeks of lead time and logistical coordination.

The factory lacked the specialist equipment and experience to carry out these measurements locally. This was the starting point for the collaboration with morEnergy.

OUR TASK

Measure train input impedance directly at the production site using a transportable medium-voltage solution.

The ONIS 20kV container solution was developed by morEnergy. We scaled our ONIS technology to medium voltage and integrated it into a mobile 10-foot container. During the on-site deployment, we used it to measure the train’s input characteristics in different configurations.

The measured quantity was input admittance, the reciprocal of input impedance. Both describe the same relationship between voltage and current perturbations at the train’s electrical input:

Zin(f; s) = ΔU(f; s) / ΔI(f; s)   ·   Yin = 1 / Zin

Here, s denotes the operating state. The following interactive examples explain why frequency response and multiple operating states matter. They illustrate the questions behind our deployment; the curves are generated independently of the customer project.

02 / OUR EXPERTISE IN THE PROJECT

Measurements gain meaning.
Through their context.

A sound assessment required more than recording the train’s response curves.

01 / TEST ENVIRONMENT

Measure the test environment too.

We first measured the test environment without the train connected. This allowed us to consider the influence of the test track and its connection infrastructure during evaluation. The train was measured in two operating configurations.

02 / VOLTAGE HARMONICS

Interpret unusual phase points.

During evaluation, we examined unusual phase points alongside existing voltage harmonics. This helped us interpret harmonic-affected points rather than treating every excursion as instability.

03 / SIMULATION & MEASUREMENT

Compare with references.

We compared the results with simulations and previous impedance measurements. Good agreement supported confidence in their use for engineering evaluation.

04 / APP-SUPPORTED OPERATION

Simple measurement. Expert evaluation.

The app simplifies measurement execution for additional users. The manufacturer’s validation engineers and morEnergy specialists are available to support interpretation.

How the results can be used

The deployment demonstrated that the mobile solution could perform the measurement task at the production site. A sound assessment required more than recording the train’s response curves.

Engineers can use this information to decide whether further investigation or changes to configuration, controls or components are appropriate. This case study does not claim a specific component change in the project.

03 / THE OUTCOME FOR THE CUSTOMER

The train stays at the factory.
Measurement becomes part of the workflow.

ONIS 20kV is now part of the customer’s validation process.

PREVIOUSLY / EXTERNAL TEST FACILITY

Take the train to the measurement.

Several weeks of lead time for scheduling, transport and the return journey.

Planning lead time
WITH ONIS 20kV / ON SITE

Bring measurement to the train.

One working day for delivery and one working day for train measurement in this deployment. The train stays at the production site.

Two individual work steps in this deployment

These are different measures of time: planning lead time and individual work steps. Additional preparation, test-environment measurements and evaluation are not fully included in the two working days.

Train transport

No train transport to and from an external test facility for this measurement task.

Personnel effort

Less personnel effort through a simpler workflow and app-supported operation.

Coordination

Less coordination around train transport and external testing appointments.

Reducing these activities lowers the associated costs. The actual savings depend on transport distance, test scope and organization.

The benefit for the ongoing validation process

The durations describe delivery and train measurement. Additional preparation, test-environment measurements and evaluation depend on the task. The previous planning lead time and these two work steps are different measures of time.

ONIS 20kV is now part of the customer’s validation process. The transportable container can also be deployed at other locations. For new measurement tasks, the equipment comes to the train, removing the need to transport it to an external test facility for these measurements.

App-supported operation simplifies execution, reduces coordination and personnel effort, and makes measurement accessible to additional users. morEnergy specialists are available to support evaluation.

Complex electrical behavior?
Let’s discuss it.

Resonances, unexpected harmonics, or interactions with the supply? We combine on-site measurement, our ONIS technology, and engineering expertise to investigate your system and provide a sound basis for your next steps.